(DanielEpstein) Pourquoi « garder le baseball sur le terrain » devrait-il incomber aux joueurs s’il y a un lock-out imposé par les propriétaires ? Pour rappel, même si la convention collective expire, le baseball peut toujours continuer sans contrat, comme ce fut le cas en 1994, avant la grève. L’annulation des jeux est le choix des propriétaires.
—
Par Knightbear49
5 Comments
that gives the players no incentive to ever sign a new CBA then
How would that even work? If the owners initiate a lockout and they own the stadiums the teams play in, how are the teams going to coordinate finding alternate stadiums to play in and all of the other logistics that go with it?
Wouldn’t Epstein be pro-owner though?
Yeah, I don’t know what to say. The income disparity large to small market needs fixed. They need a salary cap. I would rather they go nuclear and kill one season and get it straightened out. I think there are maybe three, I guess four sides if you count fans. The owners, the top tier players that make huge amounts, the rank and file and the cup of coffee guys and the agents. It’s hard to feel any sympathy for anyone but the rank and file and the fans. But no matter what this needs to get a single, painful if it must be, fix.
What you did on that island was terrible, you sick fuck