Confusion à Philadelphie alors que Joey Wiemer est initialement exclu au 1er but pour terminer la manche et que les Phillies ont également marqué Drew Millas entre le 3e et le domicile. Après examen, Wiemer est déclaré sain et sauf, Millas est autorisé à revenir en 3e position et Rob Thomson appelle tout cela des conneries. Wiemer frappe toujours 1.000
—
Par SeattleSporting
18 Comments
9 for 9
I think it’s totally fair to send him back to third right
*Bullshit
Another angle I don’t get. The Phillies broadcasters mentioned Thomson was ejected for arguing the replay. But I doubt he was arguing the replay, but rather the umpires decision to let the runner return to third. Are you not allowed to argue anything at all if replay was involved, even if you are not arguing the replay result itself?
This play may result in some clarifications in the rule book.
Imagine the hubris thinking you could get Joey Weimer out
I mean this just seems like the right call; runner was well past 3rd when the original out call was made, if there wasn’t 2 outs he probably scores easily so returning him to third after ending the inning on the wrong call just feels like the right play.
You can’t get 4 outs and bank one incase one of them get over turned. Ball was dead after the third out. It was overturned runners go to where they were.
I don’t understand why the out between third and home was overturned
Is there something in the rules for called 3rd out reviews that give the other runners immunity?
He chooses to run home..
Then gets caught in no man’s land.
Out
That makes no sense. They obviously knew they didn’t get him out at 1st so they went with the next runner who was dead to rights. If there’s 2 outs and a ground ball where they do a double play but replay shows he didn’t tag 2nd, would the out at 1st not count?
9-9 BABY
Joey « The Republic » Weimar for MVP
If this happened against any team besides the Phillies I might feel bad for them. But alas, it was the Phillies so I do not feel bad.
Is there a rule for this? Clear grey area because an assumption is being made because he rounded third during the play at first. It might be a rare occurrence but it should be cut and dry.
2 seemingly pertinent aspects from the rulebook:
“If replay review results in a change to a call that had been made on the field, the replay official shall exercise his discretion to place both clubs in the position they would have been in had the call on the field been correct.
The decision of the replay official to either uphold or change one or more calls subject to replay review shall be final and is not subject to further review or revision. Once replay review is initiated, on-field personnel from either club who further argue the contested calls or the decision of the replay official shall be ejected. No protest shall ever be permitted on judgment decisions by the replay official.”
The legendary Wiemer continues
This was the right call. Since the batter-runner was called out, and it was the 3rd out, the inning is technically over and all play is dead. If the call is overturned then it is umpire discretion as to where the runners should be placed. Placing the runner at third was the correct call.